Sure, don't give out the contact info, then request for the field service rep to contact you. Sadly I think we know the response there.Under the hood I could deal with, but this is all over the truck. I’ve asked Granger if they could replace the truck more than once and the question is always avoided. According to the Ford truck team the dealership can replace it. I asked Chip yesterday if I could speak to their field service rep and he stated that they don’t give out their management teams contact information and that the rep is aware of the issues.
Gotta agree with those points and sentiments.While there has always been a certain risk with purchasing new or used vehicles, the current state of the industry does feel riskier than normal. For so many reasons.
No way would I feel comfortable purchasing a vehicle before seeing and test driving. That doesn't mean that I wouldn't fly and buy. But it does mean I would not buy and fly, if you know what I mean.![]()
I bet it's because the thread title was edited by the OP, and the views count is likely based on the thread title. In other words, probably not nefarious at all.On another note I wonder why this thread has disappeared from the top of the most views list, it was in the lead by several thousand last I looked. It’s missing altogether now.
That's a piss poor take, especially considering some of Ford's highest sales volume dealers in the country are located in Metro Detroit, where 90% of their sales are A-plan. They don't just deliver shit and tell the customer to take a hike, and justify it because they are A-plan sales.I disagree completely. At Granger's volume level the holdback alone from Ford could provide an excellent salary for a few folks with a great work ethic and attention to detail to do PDI's, with enough left over to grease the suit dummies' pockets. We're talking an Iowa cost of living here. They have plenty of incentive at 4% below invoice, and we all know that's not the only kind of transaction they make. It's pretty clear they are low on empathy, professionalism, honesty, and integrity, and their silence in this case is particularly scummy.
Mine was built in Dearborn.I'm curious if these trucks were built in Claycomo (commonly known as KC) or Dearborn. Obviously it could happen at either, even both plants but if this old memory of mine serves correctly, KC has a bit of a reputation for poor quality paint jobs in the past.
Oh well there goes my theory.Mine was built in Dearborn.
If you look at my photos and Dustin’s photos both trucks have paint issues in the same spots. It’s even the same spot on the right side of the tailgate.Oh well there goes my theory.
I've read most of the posts in this thread and I'm sorry that Ford even sent that truck out. It should have never left the factory. What I don't understand is most if not all of the paint issues shouldn't have even happened. It's done by robots so the programming is messed up or the robots are out of sync or something. I just don't understand how it was even possible to get F-uped but it did and where was the inspection at the factory? It should've never left and put the burden on Granger and you. Oh well I could go on & on but that doesn't fix anything. Ford needs to do a buy back and that's it. They should be ashamed of the way they have handled this. Anyway I hope they make it right and soon.
Do you have a build/blend date for yours?Do you have a build date of your Blue King Ranch? I'm dealing with literally the same paint issues (minus the bubbling you have) but the insufficient paint coverage on 90% of the trucks panels... I also bought truck sight unseen (Not Granger, but Mid-Michigan) and thought it was originally just the tailgate area, but after futher inspection it's literally the whole truck... Awaiting dealership response, but getting uneasy feeling...