Snakebitten
Well-known member
- First Name
- Bruce
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2021
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 11,560
- Reaction score
- 22,964
- Location
- Coastal Texas
- Vehicles
- 2022 F150 KingRanch Powerboost
Yeah, my Mach-E should NOT be a low voltage challenge for OTA since it has the typical EV monster size HV battery to supplement the low voltage buss. However, as you point out, Ford doesn't approach the Mach-E the way Tesla would. Even if Tesla didn't centralize the processing and circuit boards on their vehicle, and instead distributed 40+ modules throughout the vehicle, I can almost guarantee you that they would tap the HV storage to support the necessity for 12V (or 48V) power during the OTA procedure.I think you are right. I am contaminated by my experience with my Tesla. It just sits in my garage and updates itself all time with no assistance needed with a far more capable self driving system. It is a vivid contrast just how much further ahead Tesla is with this technology than Ford.
I might add that Tesla does all of their updates with a cellular connection, so the internet connection is not the bottleneck. The difference is that most everything in the Tesla is now done through the Hardware 4.0 computer, not this vast array of modules with 20 year old microprocessors found in the Ford PB.
Ford just doesn't turn on the Mach-E DC/DC converter if the 12V AGM needs assistance while you are asleep.
I get it with the ICE vehicles. But the Mach-E, and even the Powerboost, Ford could leverage that available energy stored onboard to support OTA challenges.
Sponsored