Sponsored

anyone regretting getting the powerboost?

powerbeast

Member
First Name
Luke
Joined
Dec 14, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
11
Reaction score
5
Location
Guelph Canada
Vehicles
2022 Ford F-150 XLT Hybrid
Only regret is not buying the Lariat. I opted for fuel savings instead. However I’ve since been given a gas card so fuel efficiency is no longer a problem. Was actually thinking of trading for the 5.0 and putting a blower on it..
Sponsored

 

JJSnell

Well-known member
First Name
JJSnell
Joined
Feb 22, 2023
Threads
78
Messages
1,608
Reaction score
2,045
Location
CdA, ID
Vehicles
2022 F150 Platinum FX4 PB
Occupation
Owner, IT Consulting\MSP company.
Full disclosure, I have the 400w 2.7. I can't see needing more than 400w honestly. It'll power a fridge for a while or anything else I can think of just enough to hold over.

The hybrid system doesn't return the mpg numbers I would be impressed by. City driving is a pretty small percentage of total driving, and the highway rating was barely improved. I would need a solid 5mpg difference in highway and even more in city to make the hybrid headaches worth it. I do appreciate the beefier frame though.
I agree, I only see better MPGs driving through city and on windy country roads (21.8MPG) where my brakes are pressed more and the battery kicks in. If its freeway or highway, its basically an EB with crappy 16.8MPG.

As for power.. I was not able to power my 15Amp Jackhammer from my 2015 Platinum 400w inverter. But this truck '22 Plat powers it NP. Not everyone needs to run a jackhammer, but unfortunately, Ive planted about 40 posts in almost solid rock before the house and everything was built...

Ford F-150 anyone regretting getting the powerboost? 2023-06-14 13_33_10-31885SHwy97-13.jpg ‎- Photos
 

wrgrimes

Well-known member
First Name
Reid
Joined
Aug 16, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
241
Reaction score
204
Location
Shreveport, LA
Vehicles
2023 King Ranch standard; PowerBoost; 2WD; 7.2Kw
I agree, I only see better MPGs driving through city and on windy country roads (21.8MPG) where my brakes are pressed more and the battery kicks in. If its freeway or highway, its basically an EB with crappy 16.8MPG.

As for power.. I was not able to power my 15Amp Jackhammer from my 2015 Platinum 400w inverter. But this truck '22 Plat powers it NP. Not everyone needs to run a jackhammer, but unfortunately, Ive planted about 40 posts in almost solid rock before the house and everything was built...

2023-06-14 13_33_10-31885SHwy97-13.jpg ‎- Photos.jpg
I just wish I could still climb that many stairs!
 

amschind

Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,048
Location
Texas
Vehicles
'21 F150 SCrew 4x4 Powerboost
Occupation
Physician
I believe the two 5.0L trucks shown are a 3.15 and one is a 3.31/3.73 since it’s a 4WD. Both show the same 400 lb ft at the wheel on E-85. I am not trying to be rude at all! I love to learn more about this stuff but I don’t follow. I thought your twist force at the wheel is the same no matter the ratio, and that it just differs in input revs to get that same torque no? Either way this shows Ford has underrated the 5.0 on high ethanol fuels from the factory. Well they actually don’t rate it at all, Ford only says “increased performance”. No way no how is it only throwing 410 lb ft into the transmission from the crank if it puts down 400 lb ft at the wheel.
TLDR: Skip to the links below, their explanation is better than mine and have pictures.

For a dyno measurement, it is measuring power/torque at the wheel, but it's correcting that number to get the output at the bell-housing. Once you have the engine's output, the rest of the numbers are pretty simple to calculate from known gear ratios and tire size. So yes, the two output numbers are the same for the same engine despite different rear diff gears (or different tires, running the test in a different transmission gear), but that's after the raw data has been corrected for those factors. I have zero practical experience running a dynamometer, so any input from more knowledgeable folks would be appreciated, but that's the gist. The first link has actual torque curves for different gears, and you can see that the actual output rear wheel torque numbers are far beyond the engine output (i.e. the whole purpose of having a transmission). Ring and pinion gears DO add a substantial amount of reduction to the final drive ratio; if you look at the ratios, most are 3.27-4.56, which is near 1st or 2nd in most transmissions. Electric motors have relatively broad efficiency vs load curves, so they typically use a single but very short gear ratio (I think 8 or 10:1, but that's a VERY ROUGH GUESS).

My math is just taking Ford's published engine output figures, completely excluding the transmission gearing and tire size (since they're equivalent) and correcting for the differing gear ratios in the differential. I compared the 3.55 for the 5.0 to the 3.73 in the PB based upon perusing this forum: it seems like the 3.73 doesn't return great mileage in the 5.0, while the 3.31 is a little anemic for towing. I don't have any experience with the 5.0, so if folks want to correct that assumption I'm all ears. PB owners don't get a choice, so that part was easy. It works out to a ~5% advantage in rear wheel torque for the PB.

I hope that helps!


Spicer Final RPM/Drive Ratio Calculator

Good Overall Explanation with Pictures
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
I believe the two 5.0L trucks shown are a 3.15 and one is a 3.31/3.73 since it’s a 4WD. Both show the same 400 lb ft at the wheel on E-85. I am not trying to be rude at all! I love to learn more about this stuff but I don’t follow. I thought your twist force at the wheel is the same no matter the ratio, and that it just differs in input revs to get that same torque no? Either way this shows Ford has underrated the 5.0 on high ethanol fuels from the factory. Well they actually don’t rate it at all, Ford only says “increased performance”. No way no how is it only throwing 410 lb ft into the transmission from the crank if it puts down 400 lb ft at the wheel.
I hate to have to point this out -- if you want to know actual torque at the wheel (dyno doesn't give that, it extrapolates engine torque) you multiple engine torque for a given RPM x Trans gearing x rear end gearing. Yes, those massive numbers are in-fact torque at the axle. Put the radius of the tire in inches over 12 and you have torque at the ground (torque being measured in foot lbs)

Let's plug that in for 570ftlbs - 1st gear 4.69 x 3.73 = 9,971 ftlbs of torque on the axle.
Now 400ftlbs * 4.69 * 3.31 = 6,209

Check options for ratios -- 4x4 PBs come with 3.73. I don't know of any other trim of standard F150 that can option them. That's why PBs walk away from all other trims. They're able to stay right in the middle of a monstrous powerband.
 
Last edited:

Sponsored

JJSnell

Well-known member
First Name
JJSnell
Joined
Feb 22, 2023
Threads
78
Messages
1,608
Reaction score
2,045
Location
CdA, ID
Vehicles
2022 F150 Platinum FX4 PB
Occupation
Owner, IT Consulting\MSP company.
I just wish I could still climb that many stairs!
Yah that was years ago, still in progress.
Had an option to have a "tram" installed but I "wasn't gonna lay that kinda money"... Little did I know this project probably took 15yrs off my life.
Now it's all done and 102 steps from top to bottom. Shoulda just wrote the check for the stupid tram....
:(
 

JExpedition07

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 14, 2023
Threads
68
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
3,664
Location
Buffalo NY
Vehicles
2023 F-150 STX 5.0L V8
TLDR: Skip to the links below, their explanation is better than mine and have pictures.

For a dyno measurement, it is measuring power/torque at the wheel, but it's correcting that number to get the output at the bell-housing. Once you have the engine's output, the rest of the numbers are pretty simple to calculate from known gear ratios and tire size. So yes, the two output numbers are the same for the same engine despite different rear diff gears (or different tires, running the test in a different transmission gear), but that's after the raw data has been corrected for those factors. I have zero practical experience running a dynamometer, so any input from more knowledgeable folks would be appreciated, but that's the gist. The first link has actual torque curves for different gears, and you can see that the actual output rear wheel torque numbers are far beyond the engine output (i.e. the whole purpose of having a transmission). Ring and pinion gears DO add a substantial amount of reduction to the final drive ratio; if you look at the ratios, most are 3.27-4.56, which is near 1st or 2nd in most transmissions. Electric motors have relatively broad efficiency vs load curves, so they typically use a single but very short gear ratio (I think 8 or 10:1, but that's a VERY ROUGH GUESS).

My math is just taking Ford's published engine output figures, completely excluding the transmission gearing and tire size (since they're equivalent) and correcting for the differing gear ratios in the differential. I compared the 3.55 for the 5.0 to the 3.73 in the PB based upon perusing this forum: it seems like the 3.73 doesn't return great mileage in the 5.0, while the 3.31 is a little anemic for towing. I don't have any experience with the 5.0, so if folks want to correct that assumption I'm all ears. PB owners don't get a choice, so that part was easy. It works out to a ~5% advantage in rear wheel torque for the PB.

I hope that helps!


Spicer Final RPM/Drive Ratio Calculator

Good Overall Explanation with Pictures
Generally on a wheel dyno your power and torque is lower than the crank, they aren’t adjusted to show crank readings. For instance most GM 6.2L dyno 340-360 rwhp, that would be gross misadvertising if it was making 340 at the crank and they claimed 420 horsepower. If numbers were adjusted that would be BAD for Ford lol. That would mean the standard 3.5 EcoBoost is only 450-460 lb ft at the crank by most dyno readings. All Fords engines are rated on SAE certified engine dynos, the advertised ratings are supposed to be a minimum on premium fuel. The 5.0 is normally high 300s on regular fuel and the 3.5 is usually mid-upper 400s on torque. Dyno guys usually tell you to use a multiplier such as 1.15 or 1.17 to find the crank power figures.
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
Generally on a wheel dyno your power and torque is lower than the crank. If numbers were adjusted that would be BAD for Ford lol. That would mean the standard 3.5 EcoBoost is only 450-460 lb ft at the crank by most dyno readings. All Fords engines are rated on SAE certified engine dynos, the advertised ratings are supposed to be a minimum on premium fuel. The 5.0 is normally high 300s on regular fuel and the 3.5 is usually mid-upper 400s on torque. Dyno guys usually tell you to use a multiplier such as 1.15 or 1.17 to find the crank power figures.
See my previous post for updated AT THE WHEEL calculations. You're misunderstanding how dynos work, and possibly overlooking gearing torque multiplication. Gears are after all another form of lever.
 

JExpedition07

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 14, 2023
Threads
68
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
3,664
Location
Buffalo NY
Vehicles
2023 F-150 STX 5.0L V8
So the 3.5 EcoBoost is truly only 450 lb ft of torque at the crank and both are only 350 horsepower or so on regular gas? Interesting. Surprised they are allowed to over-advertise their power that much. That’s hugely misleading when you are buying what they tell you is a 400 horsepower TT V6 or V8 and neither are producing over 350 in reality.
 
Last edited:

JExpedition07

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 14, 2023
Threads
68
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
3,664
Location
Buffalo NY
Vehicles
2023 F-150 STX 5.0L V8

Sponsored


HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
Typical roller dynos have a known mass (the rollers) and know the engine RPM. They can extrapolate power and gearing by looking at the change in RPMs, the change in speed, and the time it took the change in speed to occur. Some dynos have pumps (engine dynos) and move fluid. Engine dynos measure crank power, roller dynos extrapolate it from the data. Neither tell you the amount of force you're putting into the pavement due to trans and final drive gearing.

Take a vehicle w/ a 3.29 final and swap to a 4.10 and it's a whole other animal ripping through the gears quite fast. If you put larger tires on a vehicle you have less power at the ground as the moment arm is larger. It's why large tires and re-gearing in jeeps go hand in hand.
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
So I’m not crazy, for RWD you take your wheel horsepower rating and multiply it by 1.15, the dyno does not tell you the crank ratings and there are drivetrain losses of power and torque to the wheel. See below:

https://www.garrettmotion.com/news/...horsepower-and-why-it-matters-for-your-turbo/
It really depends on the driveline itself. An automatic transmission that's locked its torque converter has the same power loss as a manual does. If it couldn't lock the converter, there's an easy 5% loss on it. The 10 speed's logic has ford locking the converter starting in 3rd gear. The longer and more complicated the driveline, the more loss there is in turning it. You see modern automatics on the dyno making damn near their rated power. The dyno isn't doing any parasitic add-ins when it reports power because it doesn't know them. It's safe to assume about 12% of the power the dyno is reporting is 'missing' due to turning over the driveline.
 

JExpedition07

Well-known member
First Name
James
Joined
Feb 14, 2023
Threads
68
Messages
2,126
Reaction score
3,664
Location
Buffalo NY
Vehicles
2023 F-150 STX 5.0L V8
It really depends on the driveline itself. An automatic transmission that's locked its torque converter has the same power loss as a manual does. If it couldn't lock the converter, there's an easy 5% loss on it. The 10 speed's logic has ford locking the converter starting in 3rd gear. The longer and more complicated the driveline, the more loss there is in turning it. You see modern automatics on the dyno making damn near their rated power. The dyno isn't doing any parasitic add-ins when it reports power because it doesn't know them. It's safe to assume about 12% of the power the dyno is reporting is 'missing' due to turning over the driveline.
I’m not disagreeing with you (totally) I think we are more in agreement than not. Just stating I’ve seen the 3.5 EcoBoost, 5.0 V8, and GM 6.2 on straight engine dynos, you can see them on YouTube etc and they all produce their factory ratings. That and the OEM’s certify these ratings. Put them on a wheel dyno and they make significantly less power at the tire compared to the crank. GM 6.2 will throw down 420 horsepower on the engine dyno, but if you look at a Silverado at the wheel on the regular dyno it’s like 350-360 horsepower. If all these trucks were that dismal compared to factory crank ratings I think it would be on the news lol
 
Last edited:

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
I’m not disagreeing with you, but I’ve seen the 3.5 EcoBoost, 5.0 V8, and GM 6.2 on straight engine dynos, you can see them on YouTube etc and they all produce their factory ratings. Put them on a wheel dyno and they make significantly less power at the tire compared to the crank. GM 6.2 will throw down 420 horsepower on the engine dyno, but if you look at a Silverado at the wheel on the regular dyno it’s like 350-360 horsepower. If all these trucks were that dismal compared to factory crank ratings I think it would be on the news lol.
I meant to clarify with the 12% loss assumed. Some vehicles can't run a 1:1 trans ratio and there's even bigger losses with that. It's often a max speed issue. The 10 speed's 1:1 is 7th gear, and with a small final like 3.2x it's not going to be able to dyno so they use another gear that involves gears. When an auto goes 1:1 it locks the entire core using no gears, and the loss arrives simply from turning the extra mass. If it has use a non 1:1 ratio, there's additional losses. Large wheels and tires are another loss. Hell even the tire compound is eating up energy as it flexes on the dyno. Driveline loss can't be overlooked however, it is loss.
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
@JExpedition07 here's a stock PB. Puts down 383hp and 502ftlb to the wheels stock



His dyno session saw him changing his order from a 3.5 to a PB, LOL
Sponsored

 
 







Top