techmonkie
Member
- First Name
- Christopher
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Richmond, VA
- Vehicles
- 2021 F150 Platinum Powerboost
- Occupation
- Security Engineer
- Thread starter
- #1
All,
Just recently purchased a F150 Platinum with the 7.2kw PPO option with the intention of being able to use it to power the house in case of outages then found all of the info related to the potential issues associated with using an interlock setup due to the bonded neutral configuration our trucks have. After doing a bunch of reading/research and consulting a couple of electricians, I reached out to Reliance to get some info on one of their transfer switches with the intention of offloading 8-10 circuits into a sub-panel type configuration. The tech rep I spoke with had mentioned this is a well known issue and had proposed something I hadn't really thought about until he mentioned it, and the more I think about it, the more I wonder if it would potentially serve as a 'safe' stopgap for going the interlock route.
It appears to be common knowledge that disconnecting the ground lead from the plug effectively tricks the PPO system to not see the bonded neutral setup on the main panel side, eliminating the ground fault event that would result in the truck not powering the main service panel, but his proposed workaround was to actually wire the ground lead to the neutral lead on the truck side of the plug, effectively 'grounding' the house side of the plug and providing a valid path to ground in the event it is required through the interlock/inlet plug when on generator power.
'Good' example: Power comes off of the hot lead from the generator, through inlet plug and 30/50A breaker backfeeding the panel and then goes to the requesting circuit/load's hot line. Return power comes through the circuit's neutral line, back through the panel's neutral and ultimately out through the neutral prong on the 240v plug back to the generator.
'Bad' example: Same scenario, but in the event there is a grounding event, power would be returned through the grounding wires in the recepticle/appliance/etc, back to the ground bus on the main panel, which would then jump via the bond strap/screw over to the neutral bus and have a path back through the neutral prong on the 240v plug back to the generator.
The net result in both instances is the same: Power has a valid path back to the generator source via the neutral lead. Granted it's not adhering to the spirit of having a separately grounded line via the 4th prong on the 240v plug, but ultimately the ground and neutral are bonded on the 'back side' of the inverter generator via the neutral bond which ultimately gets the returned power back to the same location. In this instance we're tying the 2 circuits together on the generator side of the plug prior to it going back into the truck.
Full disclosure: Not an electrician, have a basic understanding of electrical theory, haven't played with AC a whole lot. On paper, it seems like this meets the requirement of 'separating' ground and neutral from the generator's standpoint so it won't result in the ground fault, and it provides a real and meaningful ground path back to the generator from the house in the event there's an issue. I fully expect it's not going to meet code standards and may not be the most optimal way of doing it, but as far as I can tell, I can't see anything overtly dangerous short of 'you're running neutral and ground back on the same prong'. I had initially thought this would be akin to a bootleg ground, but as I understand it, in the bootleg instance you're trying the ground to neutral at the *receptacle* level in order to provide a path for the ground prong in the receptacle to return power, but as a result are also potentially energizing the ground lead, which is dangerous. In my example, you're passing any power picked up from either neutral or ground explicitly back to the truck on just the neutral lead.
Am I just crazy, or would this serve as a safer alternative for trying to use PPO in a full house/interlock capacity than just disconnecting the ground lead. I really don't want to go the transfer switch method if I can avoid it as my longer term goal is to get a 50A capable generator to power the house, and I want to have this available as a shorter term stopgap measure.. also it seems like a pretty interesting problem to try to solve.
Thanks in advance for your guys' help. I've learned a lot by reading some of the previous threads on this subject and I'm hoping this maybe introduces another option for us to consider, assuming I'm just not completely stupid with my theory crafting.
Just recently purchased a F150 Platinum with the 7.2kw PPO option with the intention of being able to use it to power the house in case of outages then found all of the info related to the potential issues associated with using an interlock setup due to the bonded neutral configuration our trucks have. After doing a bunch of reading/research and consulting a couple of electricians, I reached out to Reliance to get some info on one of their transfer switches with the intention of offloading 8-10 circuits into a sub-panel type configuration. The tech rep I spoke with had mentioned this is a well known issue and had proposed something I hadn't really thought about until he mentioned it, and the more I think about it, the more I wonder if it would potentially serve as a 'safe' stopgap for going the interlock route.
It appears to be common knowledge that disconnecting the ground lead from the plug effectively tricks the PPO system to not see the bonded neutral setup on the main panel side, eliminating the ground fault event that would result in the truck not powering the main service panel, but his proposed workaround was to actually wire the ground lead to the neutral lead on the truck side of the plug, effectively 'grounding' the house side of the plug and providing a valid path to ground in the event it is required through the interlock/inlet plug when on generator power.
'Good' example: Power comes off of the hot lead from the generator, through inlet plug and 30/50A breaker backfeeding the panel and then goes to the requesting circuit/load's hot line. Return power comes through the circuit's neutral line, back through the panel's neutral and ultimately out through the neutral prong on the 240v plug back to the generator.
'Bad' example: Same scenario, but in the event there is a grounding event, power would be returned through the grounding wires in the recepticle/appliance/etc, back to the ground bus on the main panel, which would then jump via the bond strap/screw over to the neutral bus and have a path back through the neutral prong on the 240v plug back to the generator.
The net result in both instances is the same: Power has a valid path back to the generator source via the neutral lead. Granted it's not adhering to the spirit of having a separately grounded line via the 4th prong on the 240v plug, but ultimately the ground and neutral are bonded on the 'back side' of the inverter generator via the neutral bond which ultimately gets the returned power back to the same location. In this instance we're tying the 2 circuits together on the generator side of the plug prior to it going back into the truck.
Full disclosure: Not an electrician, have a basic understanding of electrical theory, haven't played with AC a whole lot. On paper, it seems like this meets the requirement of 'separating' ground and neutral from the generator's standpoint so it won't result in the ground fault, and it provides a real and meaningful ground path back to the generator from the house in the event there's an issue. I fully expect it's not going to meet code standards and may not be the most optimal way of doing it, but as far as I can tell, I can't see anything overtly dangerous short of 'you're running neutral and ground back on the same prong'. I had initially thought this would be akin to a bootleg ground, but as I understand it, in the bootleg instance you're trying the ground to neutral at the *receptacle* level in order to provide a path for the ground prong in the receptacle to return power, but as a result are also potentially energizing the ground lead, which is dangerous. In my example, you're passing any power picked up from either neutral or ground explicitly back to the truck on just the neutral lead.
Am I just crazy, or would this serve as a safer alternative for trying to use PPO in a full house/interlock capacity than just disconnecting the ground lead. I really don't want to go the transfer switch method if I can avoid it as my longer term goal is to get a 50A capable generator to power the house, and I want to have this available as a shorter term stopgap measure.. also it seems like a pretty interesting problem to try to solve.
Thanks in advance for your guys' help. I've learned a lot by reading some of the previous threads on this subject and I'm hoping this maybe introduces another option for us to consider, assuming I'm just not completely stupid with my theory crafting.
Sponsored
. Its now hurricane season and I've had an electrician adapt my Florida Power and Light (FPL) outside wall panel with the appropriate parts and adapters a couple of years back. 