Ghurst
Well-known member
lol…. You guys talking about under powered vehicles must not have ever had to drive a vehicle from the 80’s or 90’s!! ??
Sponsored
Not true at high altitude. My Powerboost will annihilate a 5.3 Sierra/Silverado, and will still decisively walk away from a 6.2 Truck. I test drove a Sierra Denali 6.2 right before I bought this truck, and the difference in power output is significant. Really the only downside to the 3.5 EB/PB compared to the 6.2 is engine braking. Forced induction cannot account for the lack of displacement in that regard.power delta simply isn't large enough in this segment.
Ok, so you're behind a 5.3L on an on-ramp with no one ahead of him and he's not exiting the on-ramp and merging at a reasonable pace? (Now here's where we need clarification - at a reasonable pace or simply a pace that you believe you're capable of?).
I think what you're observing is simply a lack of driving ability/skill or just situational awareness that's prevalent in the general driver population.
The point that I'm trying to make is that all these vehicles don't have such a power output delta that it would overcome driver ability.
For example, if I am able to exit a corner and I'm at 10-15mph faster than the car behind me at the track out point at 40mph, you won't be able to catch me before we both hit 80mph (imaginary speed limiter) because the power delta simply isn't large enough in this segment.
If the 5.3 were so terrible, you would think there would be significant demand for the 6.2 in the police fleet market - or at least to detune the 6.2 to run regular gas. I see Tahoe PPVs with the 5.3L having no trouble merging onto highway traffic both from on-ramps and from a dead stop on the median.
I would always prefer the 6.2 over the 5.3, but based on my experience as a driver and track enthusiast, I know I could adjust to the 5.3 to make it work and still be substantially faster than the general population in most real world driving situations other than a straight line acceleration test from a dig.
Agreed.
If that were the most important criteria, add a Ford Performance supercharger onto a F150 with the 5.0. You'll have 700hp and you'll be able to call it a day.
I included the original post so we can capture the context.Not true at high altitude. My Powerboost will annihilate a 5.3 Sierra/Silverado, and will still decisively walk away from a 6.2 Truck. I test drove a Sierra Denali 6.2 right before I bought this truck, and the difference in power output is significant. Really the only downside to the 3.5 EB/PB compared to the 6.2 is engine braking. Forced induction cannot account for the lack of displacement in that regard.
I'm still wondering how I successfully navigated tens of thousands of on/off ramps all these years without the racer cornering skills and timing that is apparently necessary. Whew!lol…. You guys talking about under powered vehicles must not have ever had to drive a vehicle from the 80’s or 90’s!! ??
Yes if you could maintain sufficient speed through the corner with your 5.3 pickup and I’m not doing the same then yes you could reach 80mph before I catch you. Real world we both go around the curve at appropriate speeds for full size pickups then we both floor it and I bang into your tailgate pushing you up the hill because your 5.3l is such a dog. As we both reach 80mph, we roll down our windows and wave to one another. “ See you tomorrow!” I say smiling as you reply “Thanks again for the push!” ?For example, if I am able to exit a corner and I'm at 10-15mph faster than the car behind me at the track out point at 40mph, you won't be able to catch me before we both hit 80mph (imaginary speed limiter) because the power delta simply isn't large enough in this segment.
Correction: "Real world we both go around the curve at appropriate speeds for the vehicle and driver...."Yes if you could maintain sufficient speed through the corner with your 5.3 pickup and I’m not doing the same then yes you could reach 80mph before I catch you. Real world we both go around the curve at appropriate speeds for full size pickups then we both floor it and I bang into your tailgate pushing you up the hill because your 5.3l is such a dog. As we both reach 80mph, we roll down our windows and wave to one another. “ See you tomorrow!” I say smiling as you reply “Thanks again for the push!” ?
If you installed this: https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6066-F150SCAWheeeeeeeeeee *shift* wheeeeeeeeeee *shift* wheeeeeeee and I blow by all your slow ass pickups in my GT-500
It's like that Tundra vs. F150 thread on the Tundra forums.This has devolved much further than I thought it would, considering what the actual thread is about. I'll take it one step further. (Once I get it running) None of you guys will catch my datsun in a straight line acceleration contest, unless you run 7's or quicker. So there!
I thought about that but priorities shifted for the truck early on, that’s what the Mustang is for. The F-150 just doesn’t have the handling to really enjoy the power to its full potential.If you installed this: https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-6066-F150SCA
... you could probably just make a 90 degree right turn from a near dead stop and still blow past both @Samson16 and me in half a mile.
I was just telling myself this last month. I have a 2023 Rocky Ridge with the custom RR gauges. So glad I got the 2023 RR because the 2024 went to full digital and I like the custom setup way better! Now I can say that I have the last year of the custom gauges! Every year there’s more and more features being taken away from us customers and that’s another one of them. SMH1000% the digital layout and look it soooo cheap and cluttered.
I have a base tremor and always wanted the digi gauges.
However…….im currently stuck in a lariat rental with the digital gauges and these are video game horseshit! Super glad I have the og needles
Curious why so many people love or want 4A? I have it, and I've literally never used it. My truck stays in 2H until I need 4x4 off-road. Most times on the trail I can even get by with 2H or throw on the rear diff lock. Maybe people that drive in snow a lot want it? Why not just hit the 4H when that happens?
One example - I find a lot of side roads are covered in ice and snow and main roads are clear. In 2H, getting out of the side roads can be challenging. In 4H, you have to get moving then switch back quickly to avoid binding on the pavement. 4A takes care of everything.I've wondered that myself. I drive in snow a fair amount in winter, and I guess it would engage the front axle upon the beginning of traction loss before I do, I dunno. I've never really seen an overriding need for it myself.