amschind
Well-known member
As a PB owner, I would GLADLY trade the extra power for the extra mileage. The Ranger hybrid with the 2.3L I4 is extremely tempting pending the real world MPG numbers.
Sponsored
Morning Adam, I'm curious as to why you purchased the PB in the first place then?As a PB owner, I would GLADLY trade the extra power for the extra mileage. The Ranger hybrid with the 2.3L I4 is extremely tempting pending the real world MPG numbers.
Morning Adam, I'm curious as to why you purchased the PB in the first place then?
The modified Ford Escape Hybrid that temps you has almost nothing in common with the F150 PowerBoost except they are both made by Ford Motor Company and both can transport you and 4 passengers from point A to point B.
It sounds as if you weren't aware of the EPA numbers or that the F150 is a half ton truck and not an economy car?
We've had too many interesting conversations for that to be true so it leaves me a bit confused.
The Maverick Hybrid has a 2.5L I4, a 1.1kW battery, and a FWD CVT. 44 city/ 33 hwy.
The Prius Hybrid has a 2.0L I4, Li-ion battery, and a FWD CVT. 57 city/ 56 hwy.
Prius by 13 miles. Isn't even close.
But neither of them are trucks...
You said Ranger Hybrid...should have had my diet coke first lol
I think the Bronco might lead the way. Jeep has a PHEV Wrangler that misses the mark except on the stat sheet which is the danger imo and what makes the PB so special. With the success of the Maverick, the Ranger has to beat the Tacoma. No easy task for sure. Just ask the Tundra folks who have to compete with the F-150.The Ranger Hybrid isn't out yet, so all of this is based upon conjecture which may not prove true.....BUT the reports are that it will be a 2.3L I4 Ecoboost paired with the motor and 10R80 from the PB.
Ranger Hybrid Conjecture
The important numbers are the power and torque, which are no different from the 3.5L Ecoboost (360 HP and 500 lb-ft). If the non-hybrid 3.5L can max out the F150s towing even with the HDPP, then I'd be happy to do do it with a smaller motor and pay less for gas. The other issue is that because the 4 banger is lighter, you get some payload back for free. That in turn means that the practical towing capacity actually rises.
The issue with PHEVs, and the reason that I like the PB so much, is that the battery in a PHEV is much too big. Like a big sport fisher, the value is tied up in the marine diesels/battery. Once that piece goes, the rest is a white elephant. The PB battery is available on eBay for $1k: very few if any PBs are going to be totaled when the battery dies. The Aviator Hybrid, for all of its great points, has a 15 kWh battery that will total a >10 year old vehicle. My guess is that the Ranger hybrid will get the 1kWh PB battery, but who knows?I think the Bronco might lead the way. Jeep has a PHEV Wrangler that misses the mark except on the stat sheet which is the danger imo and what makes the PB so special. With the success of the Maverick, the Ranger has to beat the Tacoma. No easy task for sure. Just ask the Tundra folks who have to compete with the F-150.
The Ranger might be a better mid-size truck than the Tacoma but no one thinks it is and that's the challenge. The Ford Ranger has fleet vehicle written all over it, and you might find the PHEV model you're looking for that way.
Threading that needle. Interesting indeed. The PB has a way of getting our minds spinning!Yeah I think we're getting off topic, but a simple rwd ICE with the 2.7 and some electric motors to aid through the front axels would be ideal. I really like the idea of having a small 3kwh battery to leverage the hybrid assist more. I don't like the idea of ever shutting off the ice engine though, so the electric should be more of an assist than anything else to help keep out of boost and provide the 4wd capability. Maybe ice deactivation should be a setting in the infotainment to allow users to shut off the engine at stops and at low speed.