Sponsored

7.2KW ProPower for Off-Grid Cabin

OP
OP

OT66

Active member
Joined
Sep 5, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
30
Reaction score
9
Location
Ontario, Canada
Vehicles
F150 Powerboost
Different terminology but same method! Don’t remove any grounds from anything! Replace the panel with a neutral switching transfer switch. The existing panel is a shit install and your neutral bar and grounds aren’t installed right.
Can you explain to me how to properly install the neutral and ground please? Ignoring the ProPower altogether, when I was using my Firman generator, etc., how should that panel be wired?
Sponsored

 

Yves

Well-known member
First Name
Yves
Joined
Jun 12, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
157
Reaction score
109
Location
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Vehicles
F-150 2021 Powerboost XLT 302A 360 Camera 7.2KW
Occupation
Retired
Probably makes very little difference but just so you're aware, I'm in Canada, so not looking at NEC. I don't know if CEC is nearly identical but NEC is referenced so often in these posts. I'm not in the states.
Only few minor differences between CEC and NEC
 

Snakebitten

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
Jun 19, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
11,560
Reaction score
22,964
Location
Coastal Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 KingRanch Powerboost
OT66

You're a gentleman about this. That's for sure. :)
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
Different terminology but same method! Don’t remove any grounds from anything! Replace the panel with a neutral switching transfer switch. The existing panel is a shit install and your neutral bar and grounds aren’t installed right.
As I said, there is no version of any code book that says this is okay, until you treat a source as utility. You contradict yourself and don't actually have an answer. Have you ever been witness to a code change, not the print of a new book but the actual back and forth between experts as to the safety considerations involved? Show me a code book anywhere that illustrates a utility providing ground. Show me in my illustration where it's not safe (quoting a code book that doesn't have an answer to the question at hand is not proof). The fact is you've been following other's direction blindly without putting any thought into the processes involved.

FWIW, the utility pole bonds the neutral to ground at the transformer, it then feeds to the structure L1, L2, and a bare / exposed neutral (unless buried, still no ground, neutral is insulated), and when it's aerial, it's also the messenger providing the support for the L1 and L2 conductors.

Now replace the transformer with a generator and your claim is that it magically becomes unsafe?
 
Last edited:

mj1angier

Well-known member
First Name
Mickey
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
87
Reaction score
80
Location
North Carolina
Vehicles
2021 F150 King Ranch Power Boost
Yeah the ground rod in the ground is the difference between our systems. I have no ground rod.

But then I am not a "build to code" person anyway. Heck my cabin is a shed like you buy on the side of the road... but upgraded a bit
Ford F-150 7.2KW ProPower for Off-Grid Cabin IMG_0248.JPG
Ford F-150 7.2KW ProPower for Off-Grid Cabin IMG_1792(1)
 

Sponsored

Snakebitten

Well-known member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
Jun 19, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
11,560
Reaction score
22,964
Location
Coastal Texas
Vehicles
2022 F150 KingRanch Powerboost
That's nicer than what I live in.
More headroom and I dig any room that is wider than 8 foot. :)
 

HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
Looks cozy. I deal with lightning a lot and grounds aren't optional if you want things to survive. Even then lightning can still decide it wants everything blown up and wires vaporized.
 

daemonic3

Well-known member
First Name
Terry
Joined
Sep 22, 2020
Threads
22
Messages
1,808
Reaction score
1,750
Location
Sacramento, CA
Vehicles
2017 F150 3.5EB
Occupation
Engineer
I have learned a ton from this thread. The biggest learning is that no 2 experts agree with each other :ROFLMAO: j/k

What I'm super duper curious about is when the OP removes the bare ground from the neutral bus inside his panel, if neutral and ground is ohmed out is it zero? There seems to be disagreement on whether the magnum inverter bonds the neutral-grounds or not. Since the inverter can act as a "utility" like in this case, it seems like it *shouldn't* bond them and the panel should, like any other on-grid home.

According to the massive research I found done by some dude on solar forums, he investigated every major brand of inverter out there. He found that the magnum does NOT bond the neutral and ground by default. (attached)

Where there DOES seem to be consensus is that the bonding should only be in ONE place. It seems (based on the PDF file) that the inverter is not doing it. That leaves the propower and panel doing the redundant double bond. So which should be unbonded?

Again, not an electrician and I know jack and squat about NEC/CEC code. But here is my brainstorming and why my vote (if it counts for anything) would be to go with @HammaMan suggestion of floating the ground from the incoming L14-30 generator cord
  • First it just feels like a solid earth ground at the house is a more reliable ground than the rubber tires on the truck
  • When the truck is removed from the circuit, you would have to manually futz around at the panel to rebond it
  • You *could* float the incoming L14-30 bare ground wire at the inverter box and accomplish the same thing as the external inline junction box for less work, but the inline junction box feels cleaner
  • As a bonus, you could put a single pole switch at the new junction box to close the ground or open it, as desired, without ever touching wires or opening boxes again. The 2 hots and neutral would be pass-thru
 

Attachments

OP
OP

OT66

Active member
Joined
Sep 5, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
30
Reaction score
9
Location
Ontario, Canada
Vehicles
F150 Powerboost
I have learned a ton from this thread. The biggest learning is that no 2 experts agree with each other :ROFLMAO: j/k

What I'm super duper curious about is when the OP removes the bare ground from the neutral bus inside his panel, if neutral and ground is ohmed out is it zero? There seems to be disagreement on whether the magnum inverter bonds the neutral-grounds or not. Since the inverter can act as a "utility" like in this case, it seems like it *shouldn't* bond them and the panel should, like any other on-grid home.

According to the massive research I found done by some dude on solar forums, he investigated every major brand of inverter out there. He found that the magnum does NOT bond the neutral and ground by default. (attached)

Where there DOES seem to be consensus is that the bonding should only be in ONE place. It seems (based on the PDF file) that the inverter is not doing it. That leaves the propower and panel doing the redundant double bond. So which should be unbonded?

Again, not an electrician and I know jack and squat about NEC/CEC code. But here is my brainstorming and why my vote (if it counts for anything) would be to go with @HammaMan suggestion of floating the ground from the incoming L14-30 generator cord
  • First it just feels like a solid earth ground at the house is a more reliable ground than the rubber tires on the truck
  • When the truck is removed from the circuit, you would have to manually futz around at the panel to rebond it
  • You *could* float the incoming L14-30 bare ground wire at the inverter box and accomplish the same thing as the external inline junction box for less work, but the inline junction box feels cleaner
  • As a bonus, you could put a single pole switch at the new junction box to close the ground or open it, as desired, without ever touching wires or opening boxes again. The 2 hots and neutral would be pass-thru
"The biggest learning is that no 2 experts agree with each other :ROFLMAO: j/k"

HEY, something we can agree on! I'm the furthest thing from an expert though. I can tell you for sure that my Magnum inverter does not bond, it expects it at the panel. I talked to Magnum today and asked if they make an inverter that will automatically do the bonding and he said they do but only 120V inverters. They don't have a 240V that does it.
 

Yves

Well-known member
First Name
Yves
Joined
Jun 12, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
157
Reaction score
109
Location
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Vehicles
F-150 2021 Powerboost XLT 302A 360 Camera 7.2KW
Occupation
Retired
I have learned a ton from this thread. The biggest learning is that no 2 experts agree with each other :ROFLMAO: j/k

What I'm super duper curious about is when the OP removes the bare ground from the neutral bus inside his panel, if neutral and ground is ohmed out is it zero? There seems to be disagreement on whether the magnum inverter bonds the neutral-grounds or not. Since the inverter can act as a "utility" like in this case, it seems like it *shouldn't* bond them and the panel should, like any other on-grid home.

According to the massive research I found done by some dude on solar forums, he investigated every major brand of inverter out there. He found that the magnum does NOT bond the neutral and ground by default. (attached)

Where there DOES seem to be consensus is that the bonding should only be in ONE place. It seems (based on the PDF file) that the inverter is not doing it. That leaves the propower and panel doing the redundant double bond. So which should be unbonded?

Again, not an electrician and I know jack and squat about NEC/CEC code. But here is my brainstorming and why my vote (if it counts for anything) would be to go with @HammaMan suggestion of floating the ground from the incoming L14-30 generator cord
  • First it just feels like a solid earth ground at the house is a more reliable ground than the rubber tires on the truck
  • When the truck is removed from the circuit, you would have to manually futz around at the panel to rebond it
  • You *could* float the incoming L14-30 bare ground wire at the inverter box and accomplish the same thing as the external inline junction box for less work, but the inline junction box feels cleaner
  • As a bonus, you could put a single pole switch at the new junction box to close the ground or open it, as desired, without ever touching wires or opening boxes again. The 2 hots and neutral would be pass-thru
As per @hammanman recommendation is you leave the bonding at the panel all the time and you open the ground wire going from the inverter to the truck via L14-30 (adding a junction box). The thing is, if someone get electrocuted or something get damage because that ground is open will @OT66 be able to live with it. I think that @OT66 should go talk to a certified electrician, tell him what he wants to do, listen to the answer and decide on his own. When I got my transfer switch installed I went the proper way with an electrician as in Canada, province of Quebec we are not authorized to connect anything in a breaker panel unless you are a master electrician. The other reason is, I wanted everything done by code. If my house catch on fire or someone get zap by the installation I will be covered.
 

Sponsored


HammaMan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Threads
123
Messages
8,526
Reaction score
9,934
Location
SE US
Vehicles
2022 307a PB
As per @hammanman recommendation is you leave the bonding at the panel all the time and you open the ground wire going from the inverter to the truck via L14-30 (adding a junction box). The thing is, if someone get electrocuted or something get damage because that ground is open will @OT66 be able to live with it. I think that @OT66 should go talk to a certified electrician, tell him what he wants to do, listen to the answer and decide on his own. When I got my transfer switch installed I went the proper way with an electrician as in Canada, province of Quebec we are not authorized to connect anything in a breaker panel unless you are a master electrician. The other reason is, I wanted everything done by code. If my house catch on fire or someone get zap by the installation I will be covered.
The box is still grounded to the panel -- where would this voltage derive from?
 

Yves

Well-known member
First Name
Yves
Joined
Jun 12, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
157
Reaction score
109
Location
Gatineau, Quebec, Canada
Vehicles
F-150 2021 Powerboost XLT 302A 360 Camera 7.2KW
Occupation
Retired
The box is still grounded to the panel -- where would this voltage derive from?
I believe ground should be grounded. I also state what I would do nothing else to say as I'm not certified electrician.
 

Gros Ventre

Well-known member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Nov 13, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
2,690
Reaction score
1,815
Location
Western Wyoming
Vehicles
Powerboost
The issue we're dealing with is the software in the truck that shuts down the generator when it detects a neutral-ground bonding external to the truck. Such things as one person talking of a utility provided ground does not make sense and came out of not reading what has been posted. One method for opening the neutral-ground bond in the house is to remove the green neutral-ground bond screw in the house panel (or other location depending on your utility's requirements). This does not do away with the earth grounding of the house, that will remain. Electrically, since there is a neutral-ground bond in the truck (when it's connected), this is safe and complies with the NEC. Your house should have the NEC required earth gounding and that circuit should remain untouched. But: If you do something like removing that green screw in your panel... you must reinstall it when the truck is disconnected. Better to install some kind of neutal switching breaker panel.
 

Hullguy

Well-known member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
488
Reaction score
468
Location
Weymouth, MA
Vehicles
2013 F150 FX 4
Occupation
Retired Union Electrician
As I said, there is no version of any code book that says this is okay, until you treat a source as utility. You contradict yourself and don't actually have an answer. Have you ever been witness to a code change, not the print of a new book but the actual back and forth between experts as to the safety considerations involved? Show me a code book anywhere that illustrates a utility providing ground. Show me in my illustration where it's not safe (quoting a code book that doesn't have an answer to the question at hand is not proof). The fact is you've been following other's direction blindly without putting any thought into the processes involved.

FWIW, the utility pole bonds the neutral to ground at the transformer, it then feeds to the structure L1, L2, and a bare / exposed neutral (unless buried, still no ground, neutral is insulated), and when it's aerial, it's also the messenger providing the support for the L1 and L2 conductors.

Now replace the transformer with a generator and your claim is that it magically becomes unsafe?
Yes I have been at code revision discussions. The utility is covered under a different code than dwelling wiring. NESC National Electrical Safety Code. Dwellings are defined in Article 100 of the NEC. ”
Dwelling, One-Family. A building that consists solely of one dwelling unit.

Dwelling, Two-Family. A building that consists solely of two dwelling units.

Dwelling, Multifamily. A building that contains three or more dwelling units.

Dwelling Unit. A single unit, providing complete and independent living facilities for one or more persons, including permanent provisions for living, sleeping, cooking, and sanitation.”
because it is defined in the Code any house or dwelling is mandated to follow the NEC, NOT the Utility NESC!

I understand what the utility does at the pole. This is to stabilize the voltage coming from the transformer. But that’s not part of the Dwelling or NEC!

A generator for the dwelling is also covered under the NEC. There’s teo types, a floating neutral which is relying on the ground neutral bond at the panel to stabilize and provide short circuit protection.

The other one is a bonded neutral generator which the Powerboost is. This adds a second ground. The truck sees this and determines it’s a fault to ground and trips.

Sorry, it’s not magic, it’s fact! It’s a fact that under the NEC a generator supplying a dwelling IS NOT a utility. Your logic is wrong and not supported by fact. Jim.
 

Hullguy

Well-known member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
488
Reaction score
468
Location
Weymouth, MA
Vehicles
2013 F150 FX 4
Occupation
Retired Union Electrician
I have learned a ton from this thread. The biggest learning is that no 2 experts agree with each other :ROFLMAO: j/k

What I'm super duper curious about is when the OP removes the bare ground from the neutral bus inside his panel, if neutral and ground is ohmed out is it zero? There seems to be disagreement on whether the magnum inverter bonds the neutral-grounds or not. Since the inverter can act as a "utility" like in this case, it seems like it *shouldn't* bond them and the panel should, like any other on-grid home.

According to the massive research I found done by some dude on solar forums, he investigated every major brand of inverter out there. He found that the magnum does NOT bond the neutral and ground by default. (attached)

Where there DOES seem to be consensus is that the bonding should only be in ONE place. It seems (based on the PDF file) that the inverter is not doing it. That leaves the propower and panel doing the redundant double bond. So which should be unbonded?

Again, not an electrician and I know jack and squat about NEC/CEC code. But here is my brainstorming and why my vote (if it counts for anything) would be to go with @HammaMan suggestion of floating the ground from the incoming L14-30 generator cord
  • First it just feels like a solid earth ground at the house is a more reliable ground than the rubber tires on the truck
  • When the truck is removed from the circuit, you would have to manually futz around at the panel to rebond it
  • You *could* float the incoming L14-30 bare ground wire at the inverter box and accomplish the same thing as the external inline junction box for less work, but the inline junction box feels cleaner
  • As a bonus, you could put a single pole switch at the new junction box to close the ground or open it, as desired, without ever touching wires or opening boxes again. The 2 hots and neutral would be pass-thru
“if neutral and ground is ohmed out is it zero”. Because it is now an open circuit.

as far as my statement about the bonding of the neutral in the Magnum Inverter , as I have stated earlier, I was mistaken. It’s done at the panel in this installation.

“Where there DOES seem to be consensus is that the bonding should only be in ONE place. It seems (based on the PDF file) that the inverter is not doing it. That leaves the propower and panel doing the redundant double bond. So which should be unbonded”. If you use the neutral switching transfer switch there is no thought involved. It just works. If you go into the panel, disconnect the bond from the inverter neutral you have to remember to reattach it when you leave. Now you are in a live panel and risking getting shocked every single time. Why risk it? And the NEC also states that only a qualified person should be in the panel.

The correct transfer switch costs $450. Roughly another $800 for parts, wire, and installation time. Why not spend $1200, do it right and safely, with no thought?
Sponsored

 
 







Top