turbopilot
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
- Threads
- 33
- Messages
- 743
- Reaction score
- 1,224
- Location
- Prescott, AZ
- Vehicles
- 2023 F150 Powerboost
- Thread starter
- #1
I just completed a 3,000 mile grand tour of the Rocky Mountain West from Arizona to the Canadian border with my 2025 PowerBoost with 7.2 PPoB pulling a 2022 25' Electric GlobeTrotter Airstream trailer. During this trip made up of a combination of two lane highways, interstate highways and mountain passes over 11,000', the 2025 PowerBoost had a cumulative milage of 12.4 MPG while targeting a speed of 62 MPH.
But of more interest is that the PowerBoost was connected to the Airstream via an umbilical supplying between .4kW to 3kW of electricity while in motion. The power supplied to the Airstream while in motion was charging the batteries, heating the hot water and most importantly supporting the Airstream air conditioners. So while we experienced outside air temperatures in excess of 100F during the trip, the Airstream was always around 75F while in motion.
But the big surprise is that I could not discern any real change in the MPG performance of the 2025 PowerBoost while supplying up to 3kW of electricity to the Airstream in motion. You don't generate electricity for free, so there has to be some kind of performance hit to running PPoB at high outputs in motion, but tank to tank I did not appreciate any significant change to MPG performance that varied by load place on the PPoB generator. It may be that the excess regenerative braking pulling the Airstream may be getting harvested by the PPoB generator in motion limiting fuel consumption to support the generator.
On balance, my 2025 PowerBoost does seem to yield about 1 MPG better fuel economy than my 2023 PowerBoost pulling the same load.
But of more interest is that the PowerBoost was connected to the Airstream via an umbilical supplying between .4kW to 3kW of electricity while in motion. The power supplied to the Airstream while in motion was charging the batteries, heating the hot water and most importantly supporting the Airstream air conditioners. So while we experienced outside air temperatures in excess of 100F during the trip, the Airstream was always around 75F while in motion.
But the big surprise is that I could not discern any real change in the MPG performance of the 2025 PowerBoost while supplying up to 3kW of electricity to the Airstream in motion. You don't generate electricity for free, so there has to be some kind of performance hit to running PPoB at high outputs in motion, but tank to tank I did not appreciate any significant change to MPG performance that varied by load place on the PPoB generator. It may be that the excess regenerative braking pulling the Airstream may be getting harvested by the PPoB generator in motion limiting fuel consumption to support the generator.
On balance, my 2025 PowerBoost does seem to yield about 1 MPG better fuel economy than my 2023 PowerBoost pulling the same load.
Sponsored