Maybe they're waiting for Ram to release the 3.0 numbers on the hurricane engine coming to decide how aggressive they want to make it? With winter coming soon, I would be tickled if they released it by April.Nobody could possibly know more about the engine management software on the F150 than the people who actually created it.
It's kinda funny to read "still early in the development phase"
You must know that there is no development phase for Ford to adjust the calibration of an F150. That was all accomplished several YEARS ago!
What we are really waiting for is Ford simply greenlighting such a thing.
The nose plate or the underbody plate(s)?I also noticed you can buy the tremor skid plate as a kit now, for under 500. That and the lift kit - Ford Performance has some pretty cool stuff.
They do it for the bronc too. Ford is leaving so much $$$ on the table. They could do this OTA, and make loads of $$ doing it.Ford has a performance tune for the Ranger. https://performanceparts.ford.com/part/M-9603-REB It uses the same device and software as Livermois, and I'm fairly confident that Livermois works directly with Ford to create the tunes as well.
I had it on my Ranger and it did make a difference in power and shifting strategy.
https://www.lethalperformance.com/f...a4AFZkHvR8qzrkex1MvJx4QfMsz7WoFBoCK3sQAvD_BwEThe nose plate or the underbody plate(s)?
Nah, that's okay, we can leave the DPRC out of performance tunes ?The tune will need to be CARB EO certified
So I think part of this reason is because the F150 would probably be used for towing or carrying heavier loads more often than Ford's other non HD platforms. You're more likely to have a failure in those use cases - which is why you would typically see the manufacturer de-rate certain engines for more severe duty applications.So the only EcoBoost vehicle they don't have a performance tune for, is their best selling F-150. Ha.
Hoping for 50hp/50tq. And more aggressive shifting and throttle in the normal mode, but not as aggressive as sport.
Except the Raptor is 450 /510 on 35 or 37" tires and the same engine. There is plenty of room.So I think part of this reason is because the F150 would probably be used for towing or carrying heavier loads more often than Ford's other non HD platforms. You're more likely to have a failure in those use cases - which is why you would typically see the manufacturer de-rate certain engines for more severe duty applications.
... except the Raptor isn't rated to tow nearly as much as a properly configured F150. And a Raptor requires premium fuel, right?Except the Raptor is 450 /510 on 35 or 37" tires and the same engine. There is plenty of room.