Sponsored

Cold air intake - Roush / S&B / Other? Better/worse despite minor differences?

ddp0p

Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Nov 17, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
2024 F150 XLT
Occupation
Engineer
Looking at a cold air intake, and saw the S & B is less expensive than the Roush. Noticed that S&B touts it as having the slip in cover versus Roush's bolt on filter cover - which I actually prefer. Aside from that, I don't notice a lot of difference. I do prefer the bolt on, for looks as well as for fit. Is one inherently better than the other for reason I might not know?
Sponsored

 

FaaWrenchBndr

Well-known member
First Name
Greg
Joined
Jun 23, 2024
Threads
13
Messages
2,552
Reaction score
2,555
Location
Denver, IN
Vehicles
‘24 XLT Powerboost
Occupation
Semi retired aircraft mechanic
Well early depends on what you want out of the system. The best system I’ve seen is the GT momentum with a dry filter.
There have been some problems with the Rousch. It has gaps that let in unfiltered air
 

Magician

Well-known member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Aug 28, 2023
Threads
6
Messages
178
Reaction score
120
Location
Belmont, NC
Vehicles
2022 F150 XLT
Occupation
Retired
Don’t take this as me being a Debbie downer but, unless your doing significant modifications and upgrades you are basically wasting your money on these things. Ask yourself these questions and base your decision on how you answer them is my best advice.
1. What’s the goal in increasing air (maybe) volume into the engine?
2. Are you increasing the volume of exhaust out of the engine?
3. Are you increasing the fuel flow or changing injectors?
4. Are you changing the tune for any of these mods?


One thing for sure is you will be increasing the noise under the hood with one of these things. Another thing for sure is this could open up a can for sure but I base these opinions on my own experiences.

Good luck which ever way you go.
 

Golfdude1958

Active member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Sep 7, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Location
Fort Wayne
Vehicles
2025 Ford F150 XLT
Occupation
Retired
I went with the AFE Momentum GT and just installed it last week so I can’t really tell you my opinion yet.
 

MJG44

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2022
Threads
30
Messages
784
Reaction score
948
Location
Toronto
Vehicles
22 F150 Black Pack -22 Expedition Stealth - 03 HD
I have S&B on my 5.0 with dry filter.
Good quality, Roush has fitment issues.
 

Sponsored

67RS427

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
Location
US
Vehicles
F150 Tremor
Looking at a cold air intake, and saw the S & B is less expensive than the Roush. Noticed that S&B touts it as having the slip in cover versus Roush's bolt on filter cover - which I actually prefer. Aside from that, I don't notice a lot of difference. I do prefer the bolt on, for looks as well as for fit. Is one inherently better than the other for reason I might not know?
I was considering the aFe Magnum FORCE Stage-2, but now I might get the S&B because that's what Livernois Motorsports says has best fit and finish. I've always loved my aFe intakes. On my GMC Sierra with the 2.7L turbo, it picked up .65s 0-60mph, Dragy Verified (2-3 mpg better too). I know it won't be that drastic on the Ecoboost, but Livernois did say they see 15-20hp gains on the Dyno with these intakes. That may be only when tuned, which I will be after my first oil change anyway. Either way, even if it's just for the sound, it's well worth the $350 for me.
 

Golfdude1958

Active member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Sep 7, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Location
Fort Wayne
Vehicles
2025 Ford F150 XLT
Occupation
Retired
I was considering the aFe Magnum FORCE Stage-2, but now I might get the S&B because that's what Livernois Motorsports says has best fit and finish. I've always loved my aFe intakes. On my GMC Sierra with the 2.7L turbo, it picked up .65s 0-60mph, Dragy Verified (2-3 mpg better too). I know it won't be that drastic on the Ecoboost, but Livernois did say they see 15-20hp gains on the Dyno with these intakes. That may be only when tuned, which I will be after my first oil change anyway. Either way, even if it's just for the sound, it's well worth the $350 for me.
Not sure what year and engine you have, but verify that S&B has it available. I tried to buy one 6 weeks ago and they did not have the 2025 PB released yet.
 

67RS427

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
Location
US
Vehicles
F150 Tremor
Not sure what year and engine you have, but verify that S&B has it available. I tried to buy one 6 weeks ago and they did not have the 2025 PB released yet.
I can't comment on availability of the PB model, as mine is a Tremor so just the 3.5L for me. S&B shows the PB intake out of stock, but it does look like a few places do claim to have them in stock for PowerBoost models. I'm still leaning more towards the aFe with a more open design since I'll be upgrading the intercooler as well. I'm not worried about hot air, the aFe has pretty good seals up to the hood.
 

Golfdude1958

Active member
First Name
Tom
Joined
Sep 7, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
Location
Fort Wayne
Vehicles
2025 Ford F150 XLT
Occupation
Retired
I installed the aFe on my PB and it was a lot easier to install than the wrong S&B part number. I would agree that it is the better option.
 

JCsTruck

Well-known member
First Name
John
Joined
May 26, 2024
Threads
17
Messages
881
Reaction score
883
Location
Worcester MA
Vehicles
2025 Reg Cab 2WD Work Truck XL with 2.7 + 2024 Supercab XL 4x4 with 5.0 V8
Occupation
Project Manager, formerly Construction Superintendent, formerly ASE A1-A8 Tech.
$350 to replace a perfectly good cold air intake with another one that makes more noise, and arguably doesn't do much for power. :unsure:

I’m all for doing mods but this one has me scratching my head. I used to do dyno runs and tried different intakes and often times they cost you power, especially down low in the rpm band where you need it. Turbocharged engines are a little different but I don’t think manufacturers leave easy horsepower gains on the table anymore like they used to.
 

Sponsored


67RS427

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
Location
US
Vehicles
F150 Tremor
$350 to replace a perfectly good cold air intake with another one that makes more noise, and arguably doesn't do much for power. :unsure:

I’m all for doing mods but this one has me scratching my head. I used to do dyno runs and tried different intakes and often times they cost you power, especially down low in the rpm band where you need it. Turbocharged engines are a little different but I don’t think manufacturers leave easy horsepower gains on the table anymore like they used to.
I don't agree with that at all. I've seen some bad aftermarket intakes, but these are not that. It's hard to look past the flow increase you get with the larger diameter filters, and also being cone shaped instead of flat. You get more surface area, and usually the inlet tube is much larger. As I mentioned, I have Dragy results from my Sierra, with and without the aFe intake and I picked up .65 seconds 0-60 with the intake only, no tune.

Granted this picture if from an aFe intake for the 5.3L V8, take a look at the size of the filter inlet. The top is the 5.3L intake and the bottom is the 2.7L Turbo intake. Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of the stock one, but it was MUCH smaller.

With ANY engine, the easier you can make it breathe through the intake and exhaust, the more power it can potentially make. With N/A motors and PDS (Positive Displacement Superchargers), it certainly makes more of a difference. Any restriction whatsoever before the throttle body on a PDS engine, is free horsepower, hence why my 1,000hp Yukon Denali has a custom 5" intake tube.

For me, the intake is a no brainer. I am tuning my truck and plan to upgrade the intercooler. For someone that is 100% stock, with no plans for future mods, maybe it doesn't make sense. But if they wanna hear the turbos a little more, why not?

Assuming manufacturers don't leave "easy" HP on the table is pretty stupid. You do realize they have to deal with emissions BS, as well as other regulations in other states also. If they don't leave easy gains on the table, then why are canned Ecoboost tunes picking up 100+whp/tq while also improving fuel mileage?

Ford F-150 Cold air intake - Roush / S&B / Other? Better/worse despite minor differences? IMG_2580-previ
 

honda250xtitan

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 10, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
231
Reaction score
264
Location
Phoenix
Vehicles
2023 F150 XL Rattler
I don't agree with that at all. I've seen some bad aftermarket intakes, but these are not that. It's hard to look past the flow increase you get with the larger diameter filters, and also being cone shaped instead of flat. You get more surface area, and usually the inlet tube is much larger. As I mentioned, I have Dragy results from my Sierra, with and without the aFe intake and I picked up .65 seconds 0-60 with the intake only, no tune.

Granted this picture if from an aFe intake for the 5.3L V8, take a look at the size of the filter inlet. The top is the 5.3L intake and the bottom is the 2.7L Turbo intake. Unfortunately, I don't have a picture of the stock one, but it was MUCH smaller.

With ANY engine, the easier you can make it breathe through the intake and exhaust, the more power it can potentially make. With N/A motors and PDS (Positive Displacement Superchargers), it certainly makes more of a difference. Any restriction whatsoever before the throttle body on a PDS engine, is free horsepower, hence why my 1,000hp Yukon Denali has a custom 5" intake tube.

For me, the intake is a no brainer. I am tuning my truck and plan to upgrade the intercooler. For someone that is 100% stock, with no plans for future mods, maybe it doesn't make sense. But if they wanna hear the turbos a little more, why not?

Assuming manufacturers don't leave "easy" HP on the table is pretty stupid. You do realize they have to deal with emissions BS, as well as other regulations in other states also. If they don't leave easy gains on the table, then why are canned Ecoboost tunes picking up 100+whp/tq while also improving fuel mileage?

IMG_2580-preview.webp
because at the end of the day they have many variables to balance not just max power. The bean counters are usually the ones who make the final cost cutting decisions too.

Is the throttle body is the limiting factor regardless of the filter?
 

Ranger621

Well-known member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Jan 27, 2022
Threads
3
Messages
208
Reaction score
137
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lariat 4x4
I have the Roush intake. I LOVE IT!!! Its quiet when normal acceleration but has a nice growl when you get on it. If it get any benefit performance wise....great! I really like the sound.
 

67RS427

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2025
Threads
0
Messages
14
Reaction score
9
Location
US
Vehicles
F150 Tremor
because at the end of the day they have many variables to balance not just max power. The bean counters are usually the ones who make the final cost cutting decisions too.

Is the throttle body is the limiting factor regardless of the filter?
Exactly, which is why it's silly to assume Ford made the best air intake possible when they have to consider costs, and other things like emissions.

The throttle body could absolutely be a limiting factor, but at that point, the air is already compressed and being forced in. At the air filter, it's being drawn/pulled in, not pushed. If someone like Livernois Motorsports tells me they see 15-20whp with an intake when tuned, I'm gonna believe them as they dyne a ton of these motors every day.
 
OP
OP

ddp0p

Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Nov 17, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
6
Reaction score
4
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
2024 F150 XLT
Occupation
Engineer
Don’t take this as me being a Debbie downer but, unless your doing significant modifications and upgrades you are basically wasting your money on these things. Ask yourself these questions and base your decision on how you answer them is my best advice.
1. What’s the goal in increasing air (maybe) volume into the engine?
2. Are you increasing the volume of exhaust out of the engine?
3. Are you increasing the fuel flow or changing injectors?
4. Are you changing the tune for any of these mods?


One thing for sure is you will be increasing the noise under the hood with one of these things. Another thing for sure is this could open up a can for sure but I base these opinions on my own experiences.

Good luck which ever way you go.
I agree that it's a waste of money. The goal would be mostly for looks and a little sound. I don't think I'm going to do either after watching some lab tests showing how much particulate matter is allowed through on the after market options and I think my money is better spent on shocks or struts, or a leather upgrade. I had after market air in my ford fusion, and it just made it louder. I had no issues but it was extra work oiling the filter.
Sponsored

 
 







Top