Sponsored

Window sticker mpg Lightning vs Powerboost

magvallo

Well-known member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
73
Reaction score
45
Location
NE
Vehicles
2021 Lariat Sport PB
Question. My window sticker states annual fuel cost $1,700 vs Lightning $950. $750 annual difference? Are they tested the same ? Thought there would be more savings with the EV. If this is apples to apples, I rather stay with the Hybrid. Looks like the spend vs save is much larger difference. I might be missing something or just not understanding so let me know if I’m off base.
Ford F-150 Window sticker mpg Lightning vs Powerboost 058117B4-ACF7-4CC2-9120-A8BF0E6E53B9
Ford F-150 Window sticker mpg Lightning vs Powerboost 786E2ECF-1327-4306-A21A-9FAD18834447
Sponsored

 

Ajzride

Well-known member
First Name
Alan
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Threads
28
Messages
1,986
Reaction score
2,320
Location
Houston
Vehicles
21Mach-E / 65Mustang / 21PB 502A 157"
Occupation
Automation
Their fuel costs are estimated at $2.70 per gallon and electric at $0.13 per KW. The fuel is way low based on current prices, and depending on where you live $0.13 might be high (I pay $0.097). Rerun the calculations at those costs and the gap gets much bigger.
 
OP
OP

magvallo

Well-known member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jul 25, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
73
Reaction score
45
Location
NE
Vehicles
2021 Lariat Sport PB
Thanks. Yes, that makes sense I wish we still has gas prices at two something but electric costs are not static. Many utilities use natural gas to make electricity. I live in NY .20 per kwh when you include taxes and surcharges. Guess stickers will never tell the full story.
 

blentre

Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 17, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
14
Reaction score
15
Location
Austin, TX
Vehicles
2021 F-150 Power Boost Limited
You need watts per mile to really compare. To get that divide 48 kWh / 100 miles on the sticker and you get .48 kWh per mile. Multiple times the rated 24 MPG and you get equivalent 11.52 kWh per 24 miles. Multiply that by your price per kWh and you get the real cost equivalent per gallon:

48 kWh / 100 miles = .48 kWh per mile
.48 kWh per mile * 24 MPG = 11.52 kWh to travel 24 miles
11.52 kWh to travel 24 miles * $0.12 (estimate per kWh in Austin) = $1.38 per equivalent gallon of gasoline if you believe the EPA, AKA it ain't exactly free. It's lower and the bill moves from gas station to utility, but is it really worth the cost/range/towing anxiety?

Now I bet you won't see 48 kWh per 100 miles just like I don't see 24 MPG in my hybrid. Don't forget when calculating your cost per kWh to take you entire bill and just divide by total kWh used. Of course in some backwards city electrics, the more you use the more you pay per kWh (progressive - ha). We've owned an electric vehicle since 2011/2012 and still do. We had solar before an EV so really can't claim it's sun powered if I'm honest.
 

Bluesman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
390
Reaction score
415
Location
Iowa
Vehicles
1965 Factory Five MK IV Roadster, 2022 F150 Platty
How many years to recoup the initial price difference, if ever?
 

Sponsored

sempifi99

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 10, 2022
Threads
10
Messages
94
Reaction score
39
Location
Indiana
Vehicles
2021 F150 XL Powerboost FX4
Occupation
IT
Question. My window sticker states annual fuel cost $1,700 vs Lightning $950. $750 annual difference? Are they tested the same ? Thought there would be more savings with the EV. If this is apples to apples, I rather stay with the Hybrid. Looks like the spend vs save is much larger difference. I might be missing something or just not understanding so let me know if I’m off base.
Don't forget the government rebates.
 

Bluesman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Threads
4
Messages
390
Reaction score
415
Location
Iowa
Vehicles
1965 Factory Five MK IV Roadster, 2022 F150 Platty
Don't forget the government rebates.
My understanding is those phase out at certain income levels. In other words, if you can afford a $100K Lightning, you ain't gettin' no government rebate..
 

Ajzride

Well-known member
First Name
Alan
Joined
Jun 6, 2021
Threads
28
Messages
1,986
Reaction score
2,320
Location
Houston
Vehicles
21Mach-E / 65Mustang / 21PB 502A 157"
Occupation
Automation
My understanding is those phase out at certain income levels. In other words, if you can afford a $100K Lightning, you ain't gettin' no government rebate..
At the moment, they don't phase out, but it looks like the next round of rebates will. For 2022 models it's $7,500.
 

Tripdaddy95

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jul 18, 2022
Threads
8
Messages
100
Reaction score
213
Location
Dacula GA
Vehicles
2023 F-150 Avalanche Lariat SCrew PB BAP
At the time of my purchasing a '23 F-150, I was able to purchase a loaded Lariat SCrew PB for a dealer price of $70k +the taxes and fees. An F-150 Lightning is going for about $100k +taxes and fees. That is $25k to $30K more . That would make the payback like 30 years.
 

amschind

Well-known member
First Name
Adam
Joined
Apr 22, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,048
Location
Texas
Vehicles
'21 F150 SCrew 4x4 Powerboost
Occupation
Physician
The answer here is a big "it depends". The range is EXTREMELY BROAD due to the extreme variation in $/kWh for BEV charging. For example, if you have a >10kW solar array on your house, live in a reasonably sunny area, drive your truck near your house and rarely tow any distance, your fuel cost will be functionally ZERO. The other extreme is my case: my Powerboost costs less per mile than a Lightning. I work out of town, and most of my miles are away from home. Level III charging is $0.43-$0.5 in Texas, which means that 87 octane is cheaper per mile up to about $3.80/gallon with my real world mileage.

I am in the process of designing and building a solar electric Airstream, and I'm actively looking at BEV tractors, and my best estimate is that I'll have 35 kW of solar on my roof, but buying power off of the grid to charge your EV (particularly for level III charging) is a HIGHLY location specific benefit. A house level II charger for me would break even with a 40 MPG gas truck in Texas. Michigan and the Pacific NW, for example, have VERY cheap electricity, though if fuel demand turns into electricity demand, those numbers could change during the useful life of a vehicle.

Bottom line, with the information that we have today, a highly fuel efficient gas vehicle OR a BEV that you charge yourself are the two plays most likely to pay off in the next 10 years.
Sponsored

 
 







Top