Diligenthunter
Well-known member
Consider the rotating crankshaft or the rotating valve trains... consider the chain drives inside the engine. The RPMs go from around 1300 up to over 5000 and they are higher RPM than the transmission or driveline. Balancing various components and balancing between them makes a difference. And keep in mind that damage from rotational vibration is not a linear increase, it's a square function. But in the end, I think that Ford is just minimizing cost when they specify certain elements of these components to be within a given tolerance.
I would certainly agree that higher rpm increases rotational vibration and thus more damaging to an engine.
My question is how that relates to top speed and engine balance. Are we saying that holding the engine at 5k rpm in 1st is more, less or the same wear as 5k rpm in 5th? And the effect of that wear could be reduced by better engine balancing? Wouldn’t your transmission/driveline balance play a bigger role?
Appreciate the discussion.
Sponsored