FaaWrenchBndr
Well-known member
- First Name
- Greg
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2024
- Threads
- 13
- Messages
- 2,552
- Reaction score
- 2,555
- Location
- Denver, IN
- Vehicles
- ‘24 XLT Powerboost
- Occupation
- Semi retired aircraft mechanic
I guess you have reading comprehension problems. This valve deposit crap is still an issue. The dual injection only pushed it down the road a little bit. Around 130 to 150k miles.The Ford 2.7L and 3.5L EcoBoost engines with dual fuel injection (port + direct) fires almost all the time at light to moderate loads. The port injectors wash the valves constantly which results in almost no oil ever reaching the valves. Fords Ecoboost 2.7/3.5 and 5.0 Coyote (2018+) with dual fuel (port + direct) runs on the port fuel injection at 80–95 % of fueling except WOT. The only time the direct injectors fire is at high load or cold start enrichment, maybe 5–10 % of total operating time.
I believe Toyota was the first to use both port and direct injection together with their D4S system. It uses port fuel injection for cruise and part throttle situations and direct injection only under high load. This system uses port injectors at 95 plus % of operating time. Ford basically copied Toyota’s D4S system with their system.
Again, engines like the Ecoboost 2.7 and 3.5 and 5.0 liter engines with dual Injection systems (port + direct) don’t need catch cans because the port injectors spray fuel directly on the back of the intake valves 100% of the time you’re not at wide open throttle. That fuel wash keeps the valves clean the same way every pre-2008 engine stayed clean. Not much different here.
Bottom line, adding a catch can on an engine equipped with dual injection = waste of money. If you have blow by issues then adding a catch can at that point is again, a waste of money.
Do some research on it. The information is out there. Catch cans are 100% needed on a turbo engine and/or an engine that has direct fuel injection.
Sponsored
Last edited: