Smitdog
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #1
So I'm in the process of ordering a Limited 4x4 3.5EB...
In looking at many of the window stickers on the dealer lot today, they all had the 3.73 Electronic Locking Axle and at "No Charge" (these were Platinum and Limited 3.5PB vehicles).
In going through the Build & Price for a Limited (using Costco, but assuming all are the same), here are the selections:
My questions are:
1. If it costs more for the 3.31 and 3.55 ELA, why is the 3.73 ELA at "no charge"?
2. I know the higher ratios (3.55/3.73) will have more "pull" (perceived torque) off the line, and the 3.31 will give you ever so slightly better gas mileage. So if I'm deciding to go with an ELA, seems the added cost of $420 for the 3.31 (better mileage) ELA will negate any $ fuel savings, and I should just go with the 3.73 axle.
Thoughts?
Thanks...
In looking at many of the window stickers on the dealer lot today, they all had the 3.73 Electronic Locking Axle and at "No Charge" (these were Platinum and Limited 3.5PB vehicles).
In going through the Build & Price for a Limited (using Costco, but assuming all are the same), here are the selections:
- 3.31 Axle comes standard - No charge
- 3.31 Electronic Locking Axle - $420 (msrp)
- 3.55 Electronic Locking Axle - $470 (msrp)
- 3.73 Electronic Locking Axle - No charge
My questions are:
1. If it costs more for the 3.31 and 3.55 ELA, why is the 3.73 ELA at "no charge"?
2. I know the higher ratios (3.55/3.73) will have more "pull" (perceived torque) off the line, and the 3.31 will give you ever so slightly better gas mileage. So if I'm deciding to go with an ELA, seems the added cost of $420 for the 3.31 (better mileage) ELA will negate any $ fuel savings, and I should just go with the 3.73 axle.
Thoughts?
Thanks...
Sponsored