Sponsored

Why isn't there a built in record function for all the cameras?

hardrivn

Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
May 28, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
21
Reaction score
18
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicles
F150 Hybrid
It just seems silly to have so many cameras and no ability to turn it into a 360 dashcam / accident recorder exactly like all Teslas have . Ford could even sell it as an app if they wanted to be greedy about it. a Hidden Micro-SD slot in the glovebox would provide for the necessary storage if there isn't enough built in. Just seems like a lost opportunity to me.
Sponsored

 

FrankThompson

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Mar 2, 2022
Threads
39
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
1,249
Location
Sebring, FL
Vehicles
'07 Pontiac Solstice GXP, '22 F150 Lariat PB
Occupation
Solutions Architect
It is, but I don't think you'll even see them add this. I wouldn't even expect to get something like the Tesla sentry mode where you can view the cameras from your phone.

I think that if Ford did do this they would just add it to a new model year and leave all previous owners out. There is no benefit for them to do it.

I'm not a huge Tesla fan and they have their issues, but one thing they have done is add features and given them to existing customers as long as their car had the hardware (i.e. sentry mode I believe was one of these additions).
 

AAWhyte

Well-known member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Dec 11, 2021
Threads
11
Messages
193
Reaction score
204
Location
Fort Walton Beach FL
Vehicles
2022 Lariat 5.0
Occupation
PM
I'm sure they will have something similar to Tesla's sentry mode and crash recorder on the all electric trucks and cars in the future. The battery drain on the ICE vehicles for sentry mode would put to much strain on the regular vehicle battery.
 
Last edited:

discothan

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
728
Reaction score
690
Location
SW Michigan
Vehicles
2021 F150 XLT
It is another subscription income stream they are missing out on. Who wouldn't want this as an option and make it app friendly as well. This potentially could also lower the cost of insurance.
 

FrankThompson

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Mar 2, 2022
Threads
39
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
1,249
Location
Sebring, FL
Vehicles
'07 Pontiac Solstice GXP, '22 F150 Lariat PB
Occupation
Solutions Architect
It is another subscription income stream they are missing out on. Who wouldn't want this as an option and make it app friendly as well. This potentially could also lower the cost of insurance.
Well, if it was a "subscription" to record locally and only locally, I would call foul. I'm not up for paying a subscription just to use a feature my hardware supports. Now I might consider paid subscription for online backup in real time, but I would want the option to only have local storage for free.

It's a sham that there are companies forcing people to pay for features that they have hardware for only so that the company can have a continued revenue stream. I could potentially see a need if the feature is actually constantly updated (and continues to be so for as long as I pay the subscription), but unless it has some technical dependency on an outside service or technology which justifies continued cost, I'm not cool just paying a subscription to access something I already own.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP

hardrivn

Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
May 28, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
21
Reaction score
18
Location
Pennsylvania
Vehicles
F150 Hybrid
Well, if it was a "subscription" to record locally and only locally, I would call foul. I'm not up for paying a subscription just to use a feature my hardware supports. Now I might consider paid subscription for online backup in real time, but I would want the option to only have local storage for free.

It's a sham that there are companies forcing people to pay for features that they have hardware for only so that the company can have a continued revenue stream. I could potentially see a need if the feature is actually constantly updated (and continues to be so for as long as I pay the subscription), but unless it has some technical dependency on an outside service or technology which justifies continued cost, I'm not cool just paying a subscription to access something I already own.
Unfortunately there is not accessible SD slot to store the video on a recording loop, so they would probably have to cloud enable the download and thus my comment of being greedy and charging a subscription for it would be justified due to data and cloud storage costs that would be incurred.
 

FrankThompson

Well-known member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Mar 2, 2022
Threads
39
Messages
1,216
Reaction score
1,249
Location
Sebring, FL
Vehicles
'07 Pontiac Solstice GXP, '22 F150 Lariat PB
Occupation
Solutions Architect
Unfortunately there is not accessible SD slot to store the video on a recording loop, so they would probably have to cloud enable the download and thus my comment of being greedy and charging a subscription for it would be justified due to data and cloud storage costs that would be incurred.
Gotcha. In that sense I would be ok with it, though I personally would not pay for it.
 

jflottawa

Well-known member
First Name
J.F.
Joined
Mar 8, 2022
Threads
7
Messages
407
Reaction score
348
Location
Kemptville, ON
Vehicles
2022 F150 Lariat
Occupation
Director, Software Development
I would pay to continue having a connected truck and I would pay XX / mth for video cloud storage - if it meant that the truck was using its many built-in cameras as dashcams.
Sponsored

 
 







Top